When is this a useful starting point?
When customers use AI to understand your category or compare providers, and your team needs a baseline it can act on.
What buyers ask. What AI answers.
GEO and AEO consulting with Nir Levi: AI brand visibility, accessible content, credible sources and separate measurement of mentions and citations.
Prepare your inquiryFirst, find out where you stand.
A scoped review with findings and a practical plan. Before starting, we agree on the questions, languages, AI tools and data needed.
Discuss a review of your sitePrice and timing are agreed for the scope before work begins.- 01
Agree on what to check
Choose category questions, comparisons and questions about the brand. Decide which answers matter to the business.
- 02
Record the baseline
Save the date, tool, question and answer. Repeat checks to distinguish an isolated example from a pattern.
- 03
Review sources and gaps
Examine cited sources, missing or incorrect facts, and access to important pages.
- 04
Decide what to tackle first
Get findings, prioritized tasks and a way to check changes. Ongoing support is scoped separately if it is useful.
What if the problem is elsewhere?
If important pages are inaccessible or basic business information is missing, that becomes part of the priorities. The review may show that technical SEO or content should come first.
GEO / AEO & AI visibility
Start with questions your customers actually ask. Examine how your brand appears in answers, which sources support them and what information needs to become clearer or more complete.
- Customers use AI to understand your category or compare solutions.
- Your brand is missing from relevant answers or described inaccurately.
- Your team needs evidence behind reported visibility.
Clear work. Something to work with.
Questions and a baseline
An agreed Hebrew or English question set, documented system and date, and repeated samples to reveal variation.
Answers and source review
Separate brand mentions, source links, recommendations and factual accuracy. Retain the answers behind the assessment.
A content and access plan
Missing information, evidence to substantiate, consistent brand facts and checks of content accessibility.
Comparison over time
Repeat the measurement method and explain changes, limitations and next steps.
HOW WE CHECK PROGRESS
Mentions, citations, recommendations, visits and inquiries are different measures. Do not hide them in an opaque score or treat one changed answer as a lasting improvement.
Every finding should be possible to check.
This is a report template, not a client result. In a real review, each observation is backed by a saved answer and the relevant source.
Start with the worksheet- Question
- Which solution suits the customer’s need?
- Check context
- Tool, date, language and number of repeats
- Observations
- Mentions, citations, recommendations and factual accuracy, recorded separately
- Next action
- Page or source to investigate, a task and a way to verify it
From the first question to the next move.
- 01
Understand
Define the challenge, objective and data needed.
- 02
Investigate
Gather evidence about the website, content and competition.
- 03
Prioritize & implement
Build a plan and work with your teams within the agreed scope.
- 04
Measure & refine
Review what changed and decide what comes next.
Good questions. Clear answers.
How do GEO and AEO relate to SEO?
GEO and AEO describe work on visibility and answers in AI systems. They overlap with SEO through helpful content, accessibility and reliable information. Measurement depends on the system and objective.
Can you guarantee placement in ChatGPT?
No. Answers vary with the system, time and context. The work can improve information and measure changes; it cannot guarantee a place in an answer.
Do we need a special AI file or schema?
Google Search does not require these for its AI features. Assess each system separately and use accurate structured data where it matches the content.